The police received an extra reported £500,000 to keep the criminals within the confines of the air liner they had stolen at gun point, in Afghanistan.
Our 'Law and Order' government then laid on a £200 a night for the illegal travellers personal stay at the Hilton, London.
Was that a reward for stealing the aircraft, or back-up for the organisers that they were right in their assumption, that England looks after criminals better than the law abiding?
Our laws to protect us from such illegal acts are so badly framed, that a need to fully understand our language is not necessary.
We see ethnic lawyers gaining with ease, verdicts, ensuring their clients into the queue of the several hundreds of thousands Asylum Seekers.
They are backed by legal aid and laws which ensure them, free accommodation, new furniture, welfare personnel to ensure their wants and an immediate ready cash hand-out, at our expense.
On the TV we were regaled by our Home Secretary telling the world and parliament, that he will personally deal with the matter.
He infers these criminals will be returned from whence they came, forthwith. Strong on rhetoric but weak in substance, by Sunday he retracts on TV, to the amusement of the criminals and encouragement of others planning similar crimes.
It is wrong that those who seek only their lawful travel and business, should have their lives imperilled by criminals stealing their aircraft.
To allow these criminals an asylum seeking status, instead of severe punishment, is to encourage their crime.
The latter used to be known as 'Aiding and abetting' the crime.
If only our pension was increased to 80p instead of the 75p, our pensioners could at least have a loaf of bread, whilst the hijackers enjoy 'Care from the cradle to the grave', the pensioners had fought and worked for.
MR V LESTER
Liskeard




